|

The civil liability of an information intermediary for intellectual property rights infringement

Authors: Izyurova V.V., Sagipova D.B.
Published in issue: #1(78)/2023
DOI: 10.18698/2541-8009-2023-1-858


Category: Jurisprudence | Chapter: Civil and business law

Keywords: information intermediary, information and communication network, intellectual rights, liability of information intermediary, intellectual theft, intellectual property, provider, hosting companies, right holder
Published: 15.02.2023

The article deals with a relatively new concept in the Russian legislation — “information intermediary” and more specifically — the peculiarities of its civil liability. In the context of the existing in Russia mechanism of protection of intellectual rights the legal definition of the concept of “information intermediary” depending on the functions performed: transfer or placement of material in the information and telecommunications network, providing access to it, the specifics of its legal capacity is outlined. Cases of civil liability of information intermediaries and cases when this liability can be avoided are discussed in detail. The necessary actions of an information intermediary in case of detecting violations of intellectual rights are also indicated. A case in which the question of bringing an information intermediary to civil liability was considered.


References

[1] Ruban A.A. Information intermediary as a subject of entrepreneurial activity: the concept, types, peculiarities of the legal status. Molodoy uchenyy [Young Scientist], 2015, no. 11, pp. 1102–1106 (in Russ.).

[2] Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 15.04.2011 po delu N A56-45023/2008 [Resolution of the North-West region of 15.04.2011 on case N A56-45023/2008] (in Russ.). URL: https://base.garant.ru/41105632/ (accessed: 26.02.2021).

[3] Tikhanova N.E. Zashchita intellektualnoy sobstvennosti [Protection of intellectual property]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2020 (in Russ.).

[4] Amelina K.E., Kovaleva M.A., Tikhanova N.E. Pravovedenie [Jurisprudence]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2019 (in Russ.).

[5] Storozhenko O.M., Deltsova N.V. Open license as a form of authorization to use the work. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve [Gaps in Russian Legislation], 2020, no. 1, pp. 49–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2072-3164-2020-13-1-49-53 (in Russ.).

[6] Tikhanova N.E. The initial stage of investigating the drug offenses during the inquiry in an abbreviated form. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and Practice of Social Development], 2017, no. 7, pp. 80–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2017.8.17 (in Russ.).

[7] Reshenie arbitrazhnogo suda goroda Sankt-Peterburga i Leningradskoy oblasti ot 06.03.2015 po delu no. A56-61922/2014 [Decision of the arbitration court of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region of 06.03.2015 on case No. A56-61922/2014] (in Russ.). URL: http://sudact.ru/arbitral/doc/ftrnmNsnr2dr/ (accessed: 26.02.2021).

[8] Tikhanova N.E., Storozhenko O.M. Zashchita avtorskikh prav v tsifrovom prostranstve: problemy i tendentsii pravovogo regulirovaniya [Copyright protection in the electronic environment: problems and trends in legislation]. V: Tekhnologicheskie trendy i naukoemkaya ekonomika: biznes, otrasli, region [In: Technological trends and knowledge-intensive economy: business, industries, regions]. Sankt-Petersburg, Asterion Publ., 2021, pp. 48–57 (in Russ.).