Notarial examination of a website on the Internet as evidence in civil procedural law

Authors: Deev E.S.
Published in issue: #7(60)/2021
DOI: 10.18698/2541-8009-2021-7-714

Category: Jurisprudence | Chapter: Civil and business law

Keywords: notarial examination of the site, certification of the site, proof, material evidence, written evidence, other evidence
Published: 23.07.2021

Notarial examination of the site is now a widespread type of proof in the exercise and protection of rights by citizens and organizations. The purpose of this work is to analyze the rules of law governing the use of a notarial examination of a site as evidence in legal proceedings, as well as to clarify the legal basis for such use. In addition, the paper considers the legal possibility of considering a notarial examination of a site as written or material evidence within the framework of civil procedural law, and highlights the key features of the description of the examination inherent in such an object of inspection as a site on the Internet.


[1] Safonova N.A. K voprosu o primenenii tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v grazhdanskom protsesse [On the application of digital technologies in the civil process]. V: Yuridicheskaya nauka v XXI veke: aktual’nye problemy i perspektivy ikh resheniy. Ch. 1 [In: Legal science XXI century: actual problems and prospects of their solution. P. 1]. Moscow, Konvert Publ., 2020, pp. 89–91 (in Russ.).

[2] Safonova N.A. Vozmozhnosti blokcheyn-tekhnologiy v sfere protivodeystviya korruptsii [Blockchain technology opportunities in the field of anti-corruption]. V: Budushchee mashinostroeniya Rossii. T. 2 [Future of the Russian machine building. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2020, pp. 393–395 (in Russ.).

[3] Safonova N.A. K voprosu o gosudarstvennom regulirovanii intellektual’noy sobstvennosti v epokhu tsifrovizatsii [On question of intellectual property governmental regulation in digitalization era]. V: Upravlenie intellektual’noy sobstvennost’yu v tsifrovom obshchestve [In: Management of intellectual property in digitalization era]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2018, pp. 24–26 (in Russ.).

[4] Osnovy zakonodatel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii o notariate (utv. VS RF 11.02.1993 N 4462-1) (red. ot 30.12.2020) [Fundamentals of Russian Federation legislation on notaries (app. by VS RF 11.02.1993 N 4462-1) (ed. of 30.12.2020)] (in Russ.).

[5] Myshko F.G., Lyubimtseva L.P. Ensuring a notary of the notary’s evidence in the civil process, including their occupation in the internet network. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2019, no. 6, pp. 271–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-0454-2019-10356 (in Russ.).

[6] Grazhdanskiy protsessual’nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 14.11.2002 N 138-FZ (s izm. ot 02.03.2021). [Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of 14.11.2002 N 138-FZ (as am. of 02.03.2021)] (in Russ.).

[7] Zemtsov A.P. Ob obespechenii tsifrovykh dokazatel’stv notariusami. Chast’ 1 [On providing digital evidences by notaries. Part 1] (in Russ.). URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2018/7/28/ob_obespechenii_cifrovyh_dokazatelstv_notariusami_chast_1 (accessed: 16.05.2021).

[8] Begichev A.V. Perpetuation of evidence by notaries in an electronic environment. Notarial’nyy vestnik, 2018, no. 9, pp. 4–12 (in Russ.).

[9] Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 15 iyunya 2010 g. N 16 “O praktike primeneniya sudami Zakona Rossiyskoy Federatsii “O sredstvakh massovoy informatsii” [Resolution of Supreme Court plenum of 15 June 2010 N 16 “On practice in the application of “Concerning Mass Media” Russian Federation law by the courts”] (in Russ.).